Trains on customer data
unclear
Not stated in the documents we could read. An absence here is an unknown, not a no.
Opt-out mechanism
To opt out of Google cookies, visit: www.google.com/settings/ads and tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout.
“To opt out of Google cookies, visit: www.google.com/settings/ads and tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout.”
Model providers named
none named
Not stated in the documents we could read. An absence here is an unknown, not a no.
Retention
not stated
Not stated in the documents we could read. An absence here is an unknown, not a no.
Hosting regions
not stated
Not stated in the documents we could read. An absence here is an unknown, not a no.
Subprocessor notice
not stated
Not stated in the documents we could read. An absence here is an unknown, not a no.
Downstream
Who's behind PagerDuty, as listed in its own subprocessor documents. 2 listed.
Model providers
- none listed
Hyperscalers
- none listed
Other subprocessors
- DropboxUnited States
- LaunchDarklyUnited States
Reviewer notes
Extracted by deterministic rules (rules/v1), no language model. Coverage is limited to recognisable clauses and a gazetteer of common subprocessors; absent values mean 'not matched', not 'not present'. no training clause matched
Documents read
- privacy policy https://www.pagerduty.com/privacy-policy/HTTP 200 · 2026-09-06
- subprocessors https://www.pagerduty.com/subprocessors/HTTP 200 · 2026-09-05
Document changes
- low 2026-09-06 · privacy policy +2 / −2 lines
show diff
+ * relying on a formal decision by the European Commission that a certain country ensures an adequate level of protection for personal data (a full list of such decisions may be accessed online here: https://commission.europa. );+ The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction over PagerDuty’s compliance with the DPF. PagerDuty may be required to disclose personal information to public authorities who issue lawful and binding legal requests, including to meet national security or law enforcement requirements. To learn more about the Data Privacy Framework Panel, please visit https://www.dataprivacyframework..− * relying on a formal decision by the European Commission that a certain country ensures an adequate level of protection for personal data (a full list of such decisions may be accessed online here: https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/international-dimension-data-protection/adequacy-decisions_en );− The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction over PagerDuty’s compliance with the DPF. PagerDuty may be required to disclose personal information to public authorities who issue lawful and binding legal requests, including to meet national security or law enforcement requirements. To learn more about the Data Privacy Framework Panel, please visit https://www.dataprivacyframework.gov/s/article/How-to-Submit-a-Complaint-Relating-to-a-Participating-Organization-s-Compliance-with-the-DPF-Principles-dpf.
Fact changes
No changes recorded yet. Changes appear here when a later reading differs from an earlier one.
Corrections
No correction requests. Anyone may dispute a fact with a source; requests and resolutions are public and ledger-entered.
Facts are as stated in PagerDuty's public documents on the date read. This is a record, not legal advice. Work for PagerDuty? Claim this profile · Something wrong? Request a correction.